AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ahp decision making softyware3/7/2023 Furthermore, the necessity of using DSS is pointed out. The remainder of the chapter is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a critical overview of AHP’s and ANP’s conceptual foundations in the field of discrete strategic decision problems. Furthermore, the implications of more network complexity and of an enhancing number of experts with diverging software quality requirements regarding a demand for parallel and/or distributed computing architectures are subsequently focused. As a contribution to the field of ANP application, the DANP procedure is transparently shown. To cope with (inter-)dependencies of the evaluation criteria, the ANP is used as evaluation method and supported by DEMATEL to reconsider the wide range of requirements of the different department members. Based on standard criteria of ISO/IEC 25010 to evaluate the quality of software products, modified criteria were customized to the specificity of AHP software products and the demands of a Management Science Department. These persons have different profiles in academic teaching and research experiences, requirements and preferences. On this background, the paper presents five substantially varying AHP-DSS, evaluated by five members of a Management Science Department of a medium-sized university. By this, a correct implementation of this method is brought forward and the acceptance of academic staff and students can be boosted. Thereby, working with these methods and embedding them into the systematic environment of an adequate DSS becomes undeniable for students and academic staff.ĭespite the comparatively less sophisticated mathematical computation of the more popular AHP, it is necessary to secure an efficient application of this method by a suitable DSS. Additionally, the impact of these two methods in the literature is continuously growing. Within this context, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the analytic network process (ANP) are regarded as important MCDM methods to solve strategic decision problems. The same applies to academic research and paper production. In many lectures, seminaries, exercises, tutorials, papers, etc., these methods are presented, and decision support systems (DSS) are applied. In the field of academic teaching and research, the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods gain ongoing increasing importance. The described procedure is an object of reference to solve such structuring and evaluation problems by support of parallel and/or distributed computing architecture. Within such a combined framework (DANP), the alternate software products and their quality selection criteria are transparently analysed and evaluated from a multi-personal point of view. As for the various requirements of the different department members, the ANP procedure is linked with the DEMATEL approach. Owing to the interdependencies of the software quality criteria, these influences can be evaluated appropriately by the ANP. By reason of the great variety of AHP-DSS, the aim of this paper is the selection of AHP-supporting software. In the field of the research and teaching projects of a university’s Management Science Department, the use of adequate decision support systems (DSS) enables an appropriate application and acceptance of these methods. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the analytic network process (ANP) are important multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for solving strategic decision problems.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |